Atlas Curriculum Audit

Problem

A school's student-information system holds the record of what was assigned, when, and to whom. Its curriculum-mapping tool holds the record of what a course is supposed to teach, unit by unit. These two systems drift apart: an assignment gets logged in the wrong unit, an assessment ends up filed as narrative "other evidence" instead of a real assessment artifact, a vendor course's materials never make it into the map at all because the student-information system has no attachment for them. Reconciling the two by hand, unit by unit, course by course, is slow, easy to get wrong, and easy to defer indefinitely.

System

The work is packaged as a portable agent skill (SKILL.md), not a hosted app — it is a workflow definition an agent follows, not a service. It can be handed to Claude Code, to Codex, or to a Hermes-based runner as its operating procedure, with browser access to the logged-in student-information system and curriculum-mapping tool.

establish course map → build assignment inventory → classify evidence → update curriculum-map stage 2 → move misplaced attachments → sanity-check every unit

The agent builds an assignment inventory from the student-information system, classifies each item as formative or summative evidence, and reconciles it against the curriculum-mapping tool's assessments section — moving anything that was filed under generic "Other Evidence" instead. For vendor-curriculum courses, where the student-information system references an activity but exposes no direct attachment, the skill falls back to the vendor's published course guide as the source of the assignment asset. Every unit gets a final sanity check before the run is considered complete, and the skill keeps a brief audit log of what was checked, corrected, or left uncertain.

Human gates

• Every deletion or move inside the curriculum-mapping tool is confirmed by the teacher before it happens.
• Vendor AI features inside the curriculum tool are used only when the teacher has explicitly authorized them.

Provenance

Original work, built for the author's own teaching context: a skill file plus one worked example, 3 commits between 2026-06-07 and 2026-06-10. No student data lives in the repository. The repository link is withheld from this page pending a review of its documentation; no school, course-section or client identifier appears here.

Status and next

Active. Classified as client-capable teaching tooling, featured but not yet generalized. The project documents a candidate portable kit (ND-KIT-001) that would strip the school-specific vocabulary and ship the reconciliation workflow as a reusable product. No such kit is built yet.

Facts